answer 1
The others are technically correct in their answers as to the timeline. However, the Chronicles were written first & that is the series I started with. In reading the Covenant series 2nd, you go back to an earlier time and meet the characters you grew to love from the 1st series (along with a few others), at a younger age...gleaning insight & many "aha" moments as you go along, things that were only "hinted at" in the 1st series. For this reason, I enjoyed the adventure & discovery of reading them "chronologically out of order" the way they were first written. It seems rather anti-climactic knowing all the details of the European story, then getting the brief, summarized version of it later in Jerusalem. It takes away the mystery & awe. Go with the Chronicles 1st.
answered 5 months, 1 week ago

by
Anonymous
Minnesota
+1point
1out of 1found this answer helpful.
answer 2
If you want to read them in chronilogical order Zion Covenant starts in 1936 and Zion Chronicles starts in 1947.
I started with A.D. Chronicles and it did not ruin anything for me.
answered 11 months ago

by
Gwenjo
+1point
1out of 1found this answer helpful.
answer 3
Chronologically, the Zion Covenant series comes first (it begins in 1938). The Zion Chronicles picks up in 1947.
answered 1 year ago

by
CustomerService
+1point
1out of 1found this answer helpful.