Question
How is the print quality in this set and if poor or good what printing do you have ? Example: 1996 ,2006 ,2011, what printing(third, fourth),mo./yr.
inquiring about-History of the Christian Church,8 vol. set by: Phillip Schaff
asked 1 year, 9 months ago

by
Anonymous
texas
on History of the Christian Church, 8 Volumes
0points
0out of 0found this question helpful.
answer 1
The Quality is first rate, printing is excellant, and I have fourth printing May 2011, 8 volumes.
answered 8 months ago

by
Big daddy
Warwick, R.I.
0points
0out of 0found this answer helpful.
answer 2
Fourth printing, May 2011
Print quality is readable for this type of printing. There are extensive footnotes in smaller type that are not as clear as the main text. The paper is quite thin, compared to those of an original set that I found in the public library, which reduces the thickness of the volumes by about half. Considering the price, my expectations were met.
answered 10 months ago

by
cliepak
Sonoma County, CA
0points
0out of 0found this answer helpful.
answer 3
Compared to the 1985 reprint, the 2011 printing is more bold. Since it is on thinner paper (Vol 1, for example, is about 2/3 as thick as the 85 edition), print from obverse pages is about as visible as in the 1985. But at least the stronger, bolder text in 2011 reprint relaxes the eye.
answered 1 year, 2 months ago

by
freddyf
Sinsheim, Germany
0points
0out of 0found this answer helpful.
answer 4
I think the printing quality in my set is very good. Mine is the fourth printing_May 2011. But at the top of the page, it says originally published in 1858, this printing is a reproduction of the third edition, revised. At any rate, I'm happy with my set. I especially like the way Phillip Schaff uplifts the precious name of Jesus Christ, which is unusual for a history book. God bless you.
answered 1 year, 6 months ago

by
Israel2Joy
Lafayette, In
0points
0out of 0found this answer helpful.
answer 5
This set is the 4th printing, dated May 2011. Since the set is a reproduction of the revised 2nd edition from 1888, the typeface is an older style and there are occasional ink marks. The print quality of this set is going to be about the same as earlier print editions.
answered 1 year, 9 months ago

by
CustomerService
0points
0out of 0found this answer helpful.